<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Running UNIX &#187; solaris 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.runningunix.com/tag/solaris-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.runningunix.com</link>
	<description>UNIX/Solaris tips, tricks, and advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solaris 10 Update/Release Date Chart</title>
		<link>http://www.runningunix.com/2009/01/solaris-10-update-release-date-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.runningunix.com/2009/01/solaris-10-update-release-date-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solaris 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runningunix.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About once a week I have this issue &#8211; figuring out when a particular feature of Solaris 10 was made available. And if someone says &#8220;update 4&#8243;, is that 08/07 or 11/06? Here&#8217;s a chart that may help: Release Date Update # Release Notes 01/06 Update 1 Solaris 10 01/06 Release Notes 06/06 Update 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About once a week I have this issue &#8211; figuring out when a particular feature of Solaris 10 was made available. And if someone says &#8220;update 4&#8243;, is that 08/07 or 11/06? Here&#8217;s a chart that may help:<code><br />
<center></p>
<table border="1" bordercolor="#0099FF" style="background-color:#FFFFFF" width="80%" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td width="120"><b>Release Date</b></td>
<td><b>Update #</b></td>
<td><b>Release Notes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>01/06</td>
<td>Update 1</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/chapter1-1?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 01/06 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>06/06</td>
<td>Update 2</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/gbrew?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 06/06 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11/06</td>
<td>Update 3</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/gdrlm?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 11/06 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>08/07</td>
<td>Update 4</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/getjd?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 08/07 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>05/08</td>
<td>Update 5</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/gghpo?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 05/08 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/08</td>
<td>Update 6</td>
<td><a href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/ghgdx?l=en&#038;a=view">Solaris 10 10/08 Release Notes</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p></center><br />
</code>Or, here&#8217;s a PDF from Sun that shows all the releases and the notes for each:<br />
<strong><a href='http://dlc.sun.com/pdf/817-0547/817-0547.pdf'>Solaris 10 What&#8217;s New</a></strong></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.runningunix.com%2F2009%2F01%2Fsolaris-10-update-release-date-chart%2F&amp;title=Solaris%2010%20Update%2FRelease%20Date%20Chart" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.runningunix.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.runningunix.com/2009/01/solaris-10-update-release-date-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solaris 10 mount point permissions are important</title>
		<link>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/05/solaris-10-mount-point-permissions-are-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/05/solaris-10-mount-point-permissions-are-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mount point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solaris 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybersand.com/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rm: cannot determine if this is an ancestor of the current working directory This is caused by an underlying mount point permission that is too strict (700). You can change the permissions on the mount point without unmounting the volume by using lofs creatively: #create temp directory server1&#62; mkdir -m 755 /fix-mnt  # mount the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rm: cannot determine if this is an ancestor of the current working directory</p>
<p>This is caused by an underlying mount point permission that is too strict (700). You can change the permissions on the mount point without unmounting the volume by using lofs creatively:</p>
<p>#create temp directory</p>
<blockquote><p>server1&gt; mkdir -m 755 /fix-mnt </p></blockquote>
<p># mount the directory which <strong>contains</strong> the mount point, not the mount point itself, but its parent directory.</p>
<blockquote><p>server1&gt; mount -F lofs -o nosub /users/zones/server1-z3/root/users/  /fix-mnt<br />
server1&gt; ls -ld /fix-mnt/mountpoint        #confirms the permssions are not 775<br />
server1&gt; chmod 775 /fix-mnt/mountpoint<br />
server1&gt; umount /fix-mnt<br />
server1&gt; rmdir /fix-mnt</p></blockquote>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.runningunix.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fsolaris-10-mount-point-permissions-are-important%2F&amp;title=Solaris%2010%20mount%20point%20permissions%20are%20important" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.runningunix.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/05/solaris-10-mount-point-permissions-are-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed up metasync</title>
		<link>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/04/speed-up-metasync/</link>
		<comments>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/04/speed-up-metasync/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solaris 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[svm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybersand.com/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s amazing how slowly a resync happens with Solaris Volumen Manager (SVM). You can dramatically reduce your time to sync up your mirrors with SVM by adding a setting to /etc/system and rebooting. set md_mirror:md_resync_bufsz = 1024 I&#8217;ve tried 2048 (the max) as well, but not as big a gain in speed, so I stick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how slowly a resync happens with Solaris Volumen Manager (SVM). You can dramatically reduce your time to sync up your mirrors with SVM by adding a setting to /etc/system and rebooting.</p>
<p>set md_mirror:md_resync_bufsz = 1024</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried 2048 (the max) as well, but not as big a gain in speed, so I stick with 1024.</p>
<p>Harmless on &#8220;modern&#8221; Sun machines. Just don&#8217;t try this on your SPARC 20 or it may lock up on you. As long as you have &gt;1GB of RAM you&#8217;ll probably be ok.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.runningunix.com%2F2008%2F04%2Fspeed-up-metasync%2F&amp;title=Speed%20up%20metasync" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://www.runningunix.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.runningunix.com/2008/04/speed-up-metasync/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

